www.theindonesianinstitute.com

Wacana

Beberapa Catatan untuk Satgas TKI Jumat, 20 Januari 2012
Melindungi Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum Jumat, 13 Januari 2012
Darurat Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Senin, 09 Januari 2012
Jalan Panjang Perlindungan PRT Jumat, 16 Desember 2011
Jalan Panjang Perlindungan PRT Jumat, 16 Desember 2011
Apa Kabar Komisi Informasi Propinsi Jumat, 09 Desember 2011
Mendorong Dialog Jakarta-Papua Kamis, 08 Desember 2011
Mencari Kualifikasi Ideal Calon Gubernur Jakarta Rabu, 07 Desember 2011
Pulihkan Harga Diri dan Martabat Orang Papua Selasa, 29 November 2011
Perang Image Gaya Hidup Anggota DPR Kamis, 24 November 2011
Memanusiakan Orang Utan Senin, 21 November 2011
Kembalinya Kebudayaan ke Kementerian Pendidikan Senin, 14 November 2011
Memahami Kejahatan di Jakarta Kamis, 10 November 2011
Persoalan Perbatasan: Camar Bulan dan Tanjung Datu Senin, 31 Oktober 2011
Sebelum Moratorium TKI ke Malaysia Usai Senin, 24 Oktober 2011
Perombakan Kabinet Sabtu, 22 Oktober 2011
Sengketa Rumah Ibadah : GKI Yasmin vs Walikota Bogor Rabu, 12 Oktober 2011
Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan di Angkutan Umum Jumat, 07 Oktober 2011
Kontroversi Hibah F-16 : Kuantitas atau Kualitas? Kamis, 29 September 2011
Dimensi Politik Reshuffle Rabu, 28 September 2011

Volume V No. 04 - August 2010 (English)

E-mail Cetak PDF

The discourse on the need to increase the level of parliamentary threshold (PT) - the minimum threshold that is required to gain seats in the parliament - from 2.5 percent in the 2009 legislative elections to 5 percent in the 2014 elections in the revised Elections Law has been increasingly discussed. The main argument to increase PT is to simplify the number of political parties, while at the same time improving the quality of democracy and the effectiveness of the government.


The plan to increase the level of PT has even received various responses from the political parties such as the idea of merging parties. The reason is almost uniform: to simplify the party system in Indonesia. The National Mandate Party (PAN), for example, has introduced a term of party confederation. The Democratic Party is also supporting a similar idea, a merger of political parties, but by using a different term: the assimilation of political parties. Meanwhile, the Golkar Party has offered a discourse on the fusion of  political parties, like the one that was done in 1973,

The next question is how far the idea of merging the parties through a confederation or other terms can solve the problems of the multiparty presidential system? Does the idea of confederation or the assimilation of the parties actually has positive contribution to cementing the presidential system, or it just a trick to build power in the 2014 elections? This edition of the Indonesian Update will raise a main theme on the logic of confederation and the effectiveness of the presidential system.

This edition of the Indonesian Update also raises some important topic in several fields. On the economy, it talks about the electricity tariffs and the revaluation of the Chinese Yuan and its impact on Indonesia Rupiah. On politics, it discusses the minister performance evaluation and the Andi Nurpati case and the independency of the General Election Commission. On social affairs, it talks about women's participation in public policy making and the struggle to realise the freedom of the press.

The regular publication of the Indonesian Update with its actual themes is expected to help policy makers in the government and the business sector, academicians, and international think tanks get actual information and contextual analyses on economic, political, social, and cultural developments in Indonesia.
Happy reading!

 

Download/view

Terakhir Diupdate ( Selasa, 10 Agustus 2010 07:22 )  

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

You are here: Home Pendidikan publik Wacana Volume V No. 04 - August 2010 (English)